This is what your free AI visibility check looks like.
A complete sample report, written for a fictional company. Your check follows the same method: eight investor questions, five AI tools and every answer scored against your own disclosure, with the fixes we would make first.
5 AI tools · 8 investor questions
Newsflow IRAI visibility reportExample Copper Corp.
Summary
The basics are mostly right. Most of what happened in 2026 is missing.
tools knew about your latest release, the September 15 start of infill drilling at Sample Creek.
still describe Sample Creek as a drill target without a resource, three months after your maiden resource estimate.
gave out-of-date or wrong management details. Two named your former CEO.
answers cited your website. Most relied on stock quote pages and older articles.
You have issued four major releases this year: a new CEO, a maiden resource at Sample Creek, a financing and a new drill program. The AI tools investors use still describe the company as it was in 2025, and none of them cited your own website. The fix starts with a current, sourced record the tools can find.
Answers by question
Every answer was scored against your own disclosure as of September 22, 2026. Each question is scored out of 20.
Mostly right. Two answers left out gold or the project’s location.
Four answers still describe a drill target without a resource. The maiden resource was published in June 2026.
No tool found the September 15 release. Three found no recent news, and two described older releases as the latest.
Two answers named the former CEO, who stepped down in January 2026. One named an executive of a different company.
One answer mentioned the August 2026 financing, without the amount. One cited a 2025 financing. Three had nothing.
Three gave generic next steps, such as more exploration. None mentioned the infill results or the updated resource planned for 2027.
Four of five right. One listed the company on the TSX instead of the TSX Venture Exchange.
All five gave generic mining risks. None drew on the risk factors in the company’s own filings.
One answer, side by side
What an investor saw when they asked about your latest news, next to what you actually disclosed.
Example Copper Corp. (TSXV: XMPL) is an exploration company focused on the Sample Creek copper-gold project in British Columbia. Its most recent update reported results from the 2025 drill program1, and the company has said it is working toward a first mineral resource estimate2 for the project.
There have been four releases since. The latest, on September 15, 2026, started 12,000 m of infill drilling.
The maiden inferred resource was published on June 24, 2026.
Not mentioned: the August financing or the new drill program.
Where the answers came from
Share of the sources the tools cited, across the answers where a source was shown.
The quote and profile pages still list your former CEO and describe Sample Creek before the resource. Your website has the current facts, but none of the tools cited it.
What we would fix first
In priority order. Every fix is drawn from your own disclosure and approved by you before anything is published.
One page on your website with the current facts, each dated and sourced to your releases: what you do, Sample Creek’s stage and resource, management, financing and milestones. It gives the tools a current source to cite in place of quote pages.
Clear, structured versions of the January, June, August and September releases, published where research tools can find and cite them.
Markup that tells research tools which page is your leadership team, which is a project and which is a news release, so they stop guessing.
Add the planned infill results, the 2027 resource update and the risk factors from your own filings to the fact file, so answers about what comes next and what could go wrong start from your disclosure.
Recommended program
You have steady news flow, with four major releases so far this year and infill results still to come. Foundation fixes the record above. Growth adds original features and investor email around each new release, so the news that updates the record also reaches new potential investors.
We build your fact file and structured data, set up your company profile page and plan content around the infill results.
Content and email distribution around each release. You approve everything before it runs, and get your report at month end.
What we track every month
AI tools decide their own answers, so we do not promise a score. We make sure the record they draw on is complete, current and sourced to you, and we show you what changes.
How we ran this check
We asked five AI tools investors use (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot and Claude) the same eight questions. Each question named the company and its ticker and was asked in a fresh session, with web access on where the tool offers it.
Each answer was scored against the company’s own disclosure as of the check date: news releases, filings and website. The 40 answers give 160 possible points, shown here as a score out of 100.
AI answers vary by day, by user and by version, so each check is a snapshot. Programs repeat the same check every month so you can see the trend.
Want to see your own report?
Tell us your ticker. We will run the same check on your company and send you the report, with our read on the gaps. Free, with no obligation.
